The point made clear is that these types of attacks are not entirely preventable, suggesting that we must adapt to living with a certain level of risk associated with free relay capabilities. This perspective challenges the arguments against Replace-By-Fee-Rate (RBFR) by underscoring the inevitability of such security threats, essentially arguing that public awareness and discussion about the various possible free-relay attacks could benefit the RBFR approach.

Furthermore, the individual expresses skepticism regarding the necessity for formal disclosure timelines for this specific attack, given its nature as a minor variation on existing threats. This stance implies a nuanced understanding of the cybersecurity landscape, where not every new attack warrants the same level of procedural response. The emphasis on open discourse about these vulnerabilities serves to highlight a broader strategy in dealing with them, one that involves acknowledgment rather than denial of their existence.

For more detailed insights, the person has shared a link to their website, Peter Todd, inviting further exploration of these ideas. This sharing of resources underscores a commitment to fostering a well-informed community capable of engaging with complex security challenges.