The discourse acknowledges that while prior versions of these systems had legitimacy, the introduction of mechanisms capable of performing economically viable actions with high-fee transactions could potentially lessen the inherent trust required. This does not imply a full-proof system but suggests a method for reducing trust levels.

Further exploration into attack vectors reveals a strategy where monitoring the mempool clandestinely could serve as a means to verify the fulfillment of transactions. This method posits that if a transaction that one has paid for is not observed in the mempool, there might be an intention of deceit by the service provider. Such a tactic offers a practical way to safeguard against potential fraudulent activities, providing users with a tool to assess the reliability of the transaction process independently.

For more detailed insights and discussions on the topic, Peter Todd’s website can be visited at Peter Todd's website. He can also be reached via email for further information or clarification on the subject matter discussed.